Opinion on Assertive Discipline

As a reserve military cop and as "a big guy", I believe I have the ability to assert myself on students to resolve a discipline problem. I could get into some one's face and be like a basic training instructor if the situation demanded it. However, secondary students are not basic trainees. It is my impression (from the description of assertive discipline in the textbook) that the teacher does not act like a drill instructor, but it comes close. I believe when teachers act this way, it gives the "air" in the classroom uncomfortable to learning. If I had to do this to the student, the rest of the classroom time would not be fit for learning, and this feeling would last for several days.
As for putting the offending student's name on the board, that is ridiculous at the secondary level. That is done for elementary students, not secondary students. Putting names on the board should rank up there with wiping students' butts, an absurd act.
I think that classroom management and discipline is going to be my biggest challenge. I know my textbooks suggest ways to handle a situation, to me it seems like theoretical knowledge. I know that classroom management is a class I will be taking next semester, but from past experience I have had little success learning from the assigned instructor.
To whoever, reads this, please give me advice in the comment section.

Setting a standard on essential knowledge

I am in favor of having the state board of education setting a standard on “essential knowledge”. It is of my opinion that to be citizens of this world (let alone of the United States) people need to have a certain level of knowledge and understanding to relate with whomever they come into contact. However, I think setting a standard for all students is very optimistic, impractical, and impossible.

As an aspiring mathematics teacher, I would like to see all students take two years of algebra. From personal life experiences, to function in current middle-class society, people need to have basic algebra skills to look over their taxes, calculate sales tax, and keep various types of inventory. Granted, most people would think that the listed matters can be accomplished through add, subtract, multiply, divide, and technological devices. On the other hand, algebra is about grouping like items and developing logical skills. These logical skills are used in life outside of applied mathematics.

There would be another group of people who would want to raise the bar above my expectations and say that trigonometry should be a required skill for all citizens. They may state that trig is necessary for communications and traveling/navigations. It is true that trig is used to help people develop logical skills and is used in the mentioned activities, but trig’s logical skills are based in algebra and these activities do not require trig anymore. With the advent of the modern cell phone, trig in communications is not needed for citizens. Modern maps and GPS eliminate the need to use trig to calculate routes of travel. Being able to read a map is important, so should that skill be a standard for “essential knowledge” in social studies?

Setting up a standard on essential knowledge seems practical for middle-class students who have normal (and +1 standard deviation) IQ scores and no special educational requirements, but so many students fall outside these parameters. They should not be set to this standard. Students who do not fall within this parameter should have a different standard. They may need a higher or lower standard, depending what is being required of them. People of all levels of intelligence and income levels play an important part in society, whether they are a brain surgeon or a trash collector. Society needs these people, but I do not think society would place the same basic educational standards on these people.

With that being said about creating different levels of basic educational standards for different people, why is our state government making students take the same standardized test and requiring them to have the same basic levels of skills. State leadership knows that there are varying levels of class, intellectual capacity, and language skills in its residents, so why is their one I-STEP? That is a stupid question, it is money. I-STEP requires approximate $30.2 million annually to administer the test (http://www.ista-in.org/display.cfm?articleid=103). The price tag could reach in the billions if every student was to be evaluated, given a standard, and given an appropriate revision of the I-STEP. This type of assessment is impractical. Therefore, one standard is set for all students.

Would it be great that all students could be held to the same standard? Sure. Would setting a specific standard affect the individuality of the student? No. Does individuality make setting a standard impossible? Absolutely! Issues regarding race, class, gender, and mental capacity make it impossible to set the ideal standard. It would be great if this could happen, and it seems that government officials would like for it to happen, but to do so would be optimistic, impractical, and impossible.

Warm-Up Activity

Devising a warm-up activities that allows me to learn some personal information about my students is not one of my stronger characteristics. As a natural introvert, I would try to keep it simple without trying to make sure I used all the learning modalities: visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and tactile. However, I would be willing to get it a try.
As someone who has a hard time learning names, I would require the students to make name tags for their desks. This could fall under tactile. While they are making their name tags, I would have each student stand up (kinesthetic), tell me their name, a hobby, and if they like the end of their toilet paper over the top of the roll or rolling down the backside of the roll. The visual would be the name tag and seeing the student. The auditory would be hearing their information. The toilet paper comment is something silly to mention, hopefully used to lighten the mood.
I would also use the toilet paper comment to see if the student is "too cool" to make a silly comment. In P250 at IUSB, the T.P. comment does set the mood for first day introductions and set the personal atmosphere of the peer mentor groups.
This comment takes for granted that the student's T.P. hangs on a roller (and takes for granted that they have T.P. at home). In SPEA I was trained to not take things for granted, and be aware of gender, race, and class issues. (Thank you, Otis Grant, for training me well!) So, I do not know if the T.P. comment should be added to introductions. (Please, reader, let me know what you think in the comment section.)

Reflection on my own Secondary Ed. Experience.

I went to school at a small, rural school. My hometown population was 4,500, and my graduation class was 96 students. I went through secondary school during the early and middle 1990s, graduating in 1996. I do not remember much about my middle school experiences, just primarily high school. I remember most about school is my mathematics classes, especially trigonometry and calculus. I saw them as my college-prep classes and tried to learn what I could before going to Kansas State.
I remember my teachers as bordering the extremes in their teaching styles. There was the low-end teachers that tried to do the bare minimum, counting the days until retirement. Then there was the other end that saw themselves as crusaders, trying to be super-teacher and be the saviors of education. There was not much of a middle ground.
As for other students, they were extremists also. They were either friendly or bullies. I socialized with people before school and during lunch, but I did not hang out with anyone after school. That changed when I was a senior, started dating, and hanging out with another guy my age that worked at the bakery.
When I beginning my 10th grade year I got a job at the local bakery. I would arrive at work at 5:30am to make doughnuts, then go to school. I would fight to stay awake in my classes by trying to take notes. I would go home, do homework, go to some type of social club twice a week (Boy Scouts or Taekwondo), and go to bed around 10pm. What I remember most of all about my overall school life was that it was very structured between school, clubs, and work.
The grade I recall with fondness was my senior year. I was fit from cross-country, I had a girlfriend, and in November I was awarded a full-ride scholarship to Kansas State.
The grade I would like to forget is 9th grade. I HATED physical education class (the only class I got a B in). The upside of that year was my algebra teacher who made math a subject I wanted to continue to study.
I did not experience too much pressure from peers and parents. My parents wanted me to pass my classes, take four years of band, get an after-school job when I was 16 years old, and go to college. I did not have much peer pressure until I was a senior, having pressure from my girlfriend.
As for my overall feelings while I was in school, I felt like I was just floating through. I always knew I was going to college, so I always had my mind set of getting out of my hometown. The only time I felt like I had strong feelings was during my freshman year, which I really hated with a passion.
If I was to give advice to someone in secondary school, it is to take advantage of as many opportunities as possible without stretching yourself too thin. Take part in activities, talk to teachers. I took college night classes starting my junior year, having 15 credit hours by the time I graduated. There is going to be good and bad experiences in secondary school. Experience them because the experience will provide a foundation for what is encountered after high school and with life in general.